|
site map
| |
|
NorthernFront's Art'zine
|
a virtual art
market showcasing a collective of emerging artists &
photographers |
|
|
learn
of our writer's opportunities |
|
The Alice Project 2006: Six Laramie
Artists, a lost chapter of Lewis
Carroll's 'Alice Through the Looking Glass' illustrated;
recognition from the Lewis
Carroll Society of North America dedicated to furthering Carroll
studies http://www.lewiscarroll.org/popc/pcart.html
Gamut's previously featured
artists
sign our guestbook | view
|
|
In Southeast
Wyoming, there are examples of private arts development. What
are they? NorthernFront wants to know. around Cheyenne, Laramie,
and the outlying hamlets.
[The
following opinion is that of NorthernFront Editor, Terry R
Reid and may or may not reflect the positions and or attitudes
of artists appearing on NorthernFront.net or its advertisers.]
The "Healthy Art
Scene": Impossible (w/o Mainstream Economic
Development and a little Civic Pride among Artists and
Patrons)
by Terry
R. Reid [2-10-'010]
Are state or
federally sponsored endowments enough? No. Should there be private
investment in the arts? Yes.
This art community lacks support. Without
the protective umbrella of the university system and support
funding by the State of Wyoming, independent artists and private
Arts providers in our region are in danger of extinction. With
their limited opportunities for individual growth, artists cannot
survive on these large and public entities alone.
Of course, artists would
say they could use an economic boost-- more sales to stay alive,
put food on tables; but we need something else, something novel,
something practically unheard of in our part of the state --
private-sector development in the arts. That means a creative
economy created by and large with support from private citizens:
entrepreneurial development and civic commitment to the arts.
Nonetheless, the public fares very well in this artificial
setting. Oddly, we have a passionate art-loving populous that
neither retains support for nor makes investments in a free and
open market for art, but relies on public infusions for arts
developments; the same people however, would be remiss if suddenly
cut off from the cultural services it is provided by our governing
agencies and academic bodies. But the creative economy of artists and
performers cannot survive on tender lip-service alone.
So, just
how important are privately owned businesses, venues, art
galleries, etc.? What about the musicians and artists who
struggle to populate communities with their work?
In order to keep artists alive, actively producing
and performing in this lonely corner of the state, what reason do
we have to encourage artists to stay put? Why keep plugging away
at our art forms if we haven't got fighting chance in our own
community? The problem is
professional opportunities for artistic growth are limited. Though
there are examples of private arts development around Cheyenne,
Laramie, and the outlying hamlets, they are very limited-- some
would say not nearly enough, 'virtually absent'.
But among a handful of private arts
interests, in Laramie, for instance, there's 'Arts in the Park'.
Though partially city subsidized, this festival has been largely
successful by finding local meaning in the arts community away
from the umbrella of the University, inspiring what people used to
value very highly in communities across the land: hometown pride.
The organizers of Arts in the Park are ordinary folks open
to all the possibilities their town has to offer. They have a
sense of self-reliance and stewardship that reaches beyond the
scope of of 'what's in it for me alone?'. There's also an
acceptance of the responsibilities of private arts management and
an expectation in the role of the arts to play a part in
developing satisfaction among its constituents .
Industry sustainability dictates a
market for all professions, awareness of this principle, however,
should extend from producer to consumer and back, but here this
tenant of business has failed. Consequently, neither artist nor
consumer are capable of recouping the benefits of the arts. In
fact, the cultural potential of non-UW Laramie
has been manipulated and monopolized to such an extent that the
market for private artists is practically non-existent.
Artists that choose to stay here after
college often feel out of place, aimless, irresponsible, socially
stigmatized, professionally 'upside down'. With regards to their
career interests, many are unable to support themselves with their
art and if they don't completely give it up, they find unrelated
and thankless employment --it puts food on the table and pays the
rent, but leaves little time and energy for creative endeavors. A
lot of local artists become 'stuck', unable to achieve their
full potential, professionally "underemployed" and
"displaced". Some turn to programs to subsidize their
living expenses.
Do we put the onus on local artists
because they can't make a sale; drive out the actors because
there's no where to perform? Or do we just accept this struggling
group with all of their shortcomings (My GOD! is there
no room for spontaneous street performances? What lovely Graffiti!
our young artists are making! Come On!)
What we need is forward thinking
patrons to reinvest in our cultural environment. In Albany and
Laramie Counties, that doesn't just mean an injection of
enthusiastic support, it means revitalization of the interested
parties themselves--this can happen through new endowments in the
private sector; by creating musical and theatrical venues where
they're lacking, upgrading existing services for creative people,
and enabling cultural purveyors to provide goods and services to
consumers; aside from that, it means addressing the cultural
concerns that make the arts vital to civic development in the
first place.
To put it in perspective, over the
years (and I've been here a long time,) I've seen a steady exodus
of creative people seeking greener pastures elsewhere--these
artists have simply gotten fed up and left. Given better
opportunities, many might have stayed. So, if we want retention of
artists in our community, we need a creative
economy outside of the academic milieu, and we need cultural and
economic development geared to the artistic growth of the
community itself. And its from this 'private' realm that real art
arises, not the offices that represent the public. Without
this understanding, artists and the art they make will simply
evaporate; without private support, artists are left with no
recourse but to leave.
If arts consumers would help fashion
artistic and creative opportunities for artists, there would be
more opportunities to enjoy, to be entertained. The model here is
that arts consumers can truly be Patrons of the Arts, and Patrons
can be front and center in the production of fine arts and
cultural programs. So long as consumers become bigger players in
cultural production, artists and the arts survive. It's vital,
it's simple: artists and the public pay and play. There's more
than one way to build a road. Okay? The building process for the
arts, between government and artists the and maintaining a local
framework on which to hang lasting careers and the public needs to
remain committed to the arts by showing up at local events,
becoming patrons, buying the work of local artists, and helping to
create a local creative economy by investing in the arts in our
communities.
| |
| |
ART EDITORIAL |
|
|
The Artist in Albany
County
|
By
Terry R. Reid, January 2010
In general, the average artist
is poor, statistics put him or her at or below the
national poverty line. For
the most part, they are impoverished workers, working
for retailers who make a decent commission from the work
they produce, but artists themselves don't get a decent
salary in return. In all the plastic arts,
there's a high cost to
profit ratio, material prices are outrageous,
and little thought is given to the provision of
space for artists. What's more, in tough times there is
an idea that there is no more frivolous endeavor than
painting and sculpture; people
stop purchasing art for obvious reasons. |
| During
the Great Depression, artists were among the first
American workers to experience economic collapse; yet,
it was clear that artists were highly valued for their
creative skills as they were recognized as
among the most needy and social welfare programs
were initiated to help them as part of the Federal
Workers Program. Conditions aren't very different
today. So I ask, besides the patronage of a
free-wielding consumer market in an art buying mood,
(which it is currently not) where are the great patrons
of the arts today in Albany County, where's the relief
for artists when we need it? Okay? as a trade artists
must make huge tradeoffs...unless you are well-off,
employed with a time-consuming un related full-time job,
have a supportive network of friends and family or
are born rich, art is nearly impossible to
practice. More
than any other 'hobby', just being a lowly
'Sunday' artist requires considerable outlays of
money. Unless one has reached that gilded gallery stage
or been at the right place at the right time, prices
garnered for quality finished work are low, and
mediocrity is rewarded as its relatively low value can
be purchased justifiably, but will often never
return its value in the open market, but generally
decrease in value over time.
Why do so many true artists
fail? Personally, I don't see why this has to be so. And
why do some arts organizations believe they must make
such a killing off people who are at the bottom of
the local, regional and national feeding
chain? Why do we insist on publicly seeing
many of these arts organizations (a little too
idealistically, I'd say) way up in the sky
like butterflies enjoying the beautiful sunlight, while,
for all tense and purposes, many artists privately see
them often as bottom feeders. True artists deserve as
close to a 'living wage' as possible, while arts
organizations must be able to make enough money to cover
operating expenses in order to help artists. Yet artists
with and without subsistence wages must be secure enough
to freely rattle their own art cages, demanding sales at
fair market value like any other business person as well
as fair organizational fees. Artists themselves must be
willing to ask for patronage from local businesses,
corporations and even private citizens. Seeking
patronage is right and dutiful for every artist, just as
being a patron and giving to the arts is the civic right
of the public. Artists should abandon the mistaken
belief they must 'pay their dues' in order to live up
society's quite lofty social perception of them.
Independence, autonomy and empowerment are the
requirements of the successful artist in order to make
more than a pittance enough from their work.
The ideal situation for arts
organizations would be to ask of artists the minimal of
what it would take to be profitable and still leave
enough for the artist to be able to create. Their
provision for daily operating expenses should not come
primarily from artists, but from other sources,
including government granting organizations as well as
local, regional and national businesses and
corporations.
Advice to artists: artists need to be business
minded, too. Yes, it's difficult to market your
own work, it's a totally separate mindset that most
artists don't train for. Learning this anew is
mind-blowing, but turning to that segment of the retail
market that specializes in art sales is no less daunting
mostly because of the artist's ego. What's most
uncomfortable, I guess, is the idea of giving
control of their images and careers to agents or reps.
If you don't wish to be at the mercy of those who will
abuse you, you must learn to protect your interests by
understanding the art market, taking on new business
concepts and models of trade. If you can cut out the
middleman, more power to you, it will enable you to
bring your art to market yourself. In lieu of that, look
for organizations that truly want to assist you, avoid
those that are constantly hitting you up for
contributions and costly fees. Luckily
these days we have the web, which is a great way to be
seen worldwide, but there are websites that are
unscrupulous and do not give you the attention you need.
In your research find businesses that cater to
artists and their needs; galleries that are really
representative of you and your working aims.
(And let's not forget
charities-- they say, if you give, you'll reap rewards--
but oftentimes there's a leisurely attitude that thinks
artists can afford to give away their hard work fast and
easy. If this is your organization's belief, be certain
that you are receiving a great gift, respect the artist
and don't just give this hard earned work away. Such
organizations must make a statement about the relative
importance of the sacrifice of hardworking artists in
the equation of need. If you're an artist who gives,
give to reputable organizations with a good track record
who puts equal attention on each unique piece of art.
Don't just give out of some perceived, but
unrealistic notion of charity in trade for honor).
I certainly don't want to stand
in the way of progress. The real roadblock for all
artists is a refusal to see things
realistically. Art patrons and organizations must help
the artists they can. There are organizations with more
support, more money and resources and more people behind
them most of us artists have, they shouldn't compete for
the very resources that sustains us. If all they can
offer us is a level of local entrepreneurial
interference -- then they aren't helping us at all. In
Albany County we should look for organizations that
provide real opportunities, real assistance and
support for artists and offers commitments to job
creation. We need an "Art Project" that gives
artists something to look forward to not weakens us.
My
suggestion to young artists... make cards, tee shirts,
design clothes, sell prints, self publish... anything to
have control over your own art, whatever it is, make
your own exhibition opportunities until you are your own
arts organization. Be the guardian of your own best
interests. Learn the ropes of business early. Be
ambitious, be strong and believe in yourself, but don't
settle for "assistance" from local
organizations promise things they can't deliver.
Gamut's |
| |
| |
PAINTING
|
|
|
On
Photography & Art
Jan 2002
[republished]
by Linda Lillegraven
Wyoming
Landscape Artist
|
Linda
Lillegraven, from Laramie, was the 2001 Grand Prize
Winner of the Arts for the Parks Competition held annually
at Jackson. The $50,000 award went to her Bank of the
Yellowstone oil. A panel of three national art experts
reviewed over 2200 entries.
|
|
How I Work
Whenever I'm outdoors, my brain is in
"observation mode." I try to always be aware of
light, and color and form, and of the ways my eyes and
mind perceive and interpret these things. But when the
light is especially promising, I grab my sketchbook and
camera, jump into my old truck, and set out in search of
new images. I might drive up to Shirley Basin again, a
vast open area north of Medicine Bow, Wyoming. There's
little traffic and it's usually easy to pull off the, road
when my "mental view-finder" sees something
interesting. I'm not looking for any single picturesque
subject, but rather for the right combination of good
design, color, space, and even mood. The light may be
right only for a moment. I'll stop, leap out, shoot four
or five reference photos, and maybe make a thumbnail
sketch. . But by far the most important thing that I do is
remember that moment, and why I felt it would make a good
painting. It's especially important not to allow the
photograph to "take over" my mental image of the
scene. I don't have (and wouldn't want) a photographic
memory for all the details. But the better I train myself
to remember the smell of the wind, the sound of the dry
grass, and the feeling of being alone in a vast space, the
better my work becomes.
WHY THE CAMERA IS
DANGEROUS
There's, a saying that "the camera
doesn't lie." In our culture, at least, photographs
are given the bye it of the doubt as records of
truthfulness. More and more, they are the way we
experience the visible world. But of course, human vision
isn't a series of snapshots. It is a complex, dynamic
interaction of eye, brain, and experience. The camera does
lie, but it has no imagination. For example, the
difference between the lightest lights and the darkest
dark tones visible outdoors on a sunny day is many times
greater than the difference between white and black on the
surface of a photograph (or painting). Your eyes adjust
automatically when you look from sun into shade and back
again in a single scene. The camera, however high-tech,
can't do that, and renders shadows as featureless black
patches. (Or, if the shadows are properly exposed, the
sunlit areas will appear washed out). The secret to making
your camera a useful reference tool is to spend time
sketching outdoors, making color notes, learning to be a
good observer, and learning how to translate your camera's
lies into useful information. Those sketches and notes
will not impress your friends and relatives the way a
painstakingly copied photograph will. You may never even
want to show them to anyone. But they will be the first
steps on the road to developing a real artistic vision.
SO WHY DO I PAINT IN THE STUDIO?
Many artists feel that the only way to
"capture the moment" with freshness and
spontaneity is to work outdoors from start to finish. But
we all have different goals and priorities in what we're
trying to accomplish. The search for harmony and balance
is important to me, and that requires time for reflection.
I like to think of my paintings as a kind
of poetry. A good poet can use familiar words and standard
grammar to help us see beauty where we had never noticed
it, or to deepen our understanding of our place in the
universe. Such poems aren't written "on the
spot." They are revised and refined, set aside and
taken up again, and turned over in the mind until they are
as spare and perfect as the poet can make them.
Gamut's
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|

Pastels by Tad Anderson at Big Hollow Foods in
Laramie
Art Quote...
"Bad artists copy.
Good artists steal." -Pablo Picasso
"Everyone who
enjoys thinks that the principal thing to the tree is the fruit, but in
point of fact the principal thing to it is the seed.—Herein lies the
difference between them that create and them that enjoy." Maxims of
Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (1844–1900)
“Until one is committed, there is hesitancy,
the chance to draw back. Concerning all acts of initiative (and
creation), there is one elementary truth, the ignorance of which kills
countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely
commits oneself, then Providence moves too. All sorts of things occur
to help one that would never otherwise have occurred. A whole stream
of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner
of unforeseen incidents and meetings and material assistance, which no
man could have dreamed would have come his way. Whatever you can do,
or dream you can do, begin it. Boldness has genius, power, and magic
in it. Begin it now.”
William Hutchinson Murray (1913-1996), from his
1951 book entitled The Scottish Himalayan Expedition. The actual
final lines from W.H. Murray's book end this way (emphasis added): “...which
no man could have dreamed would have come his way. I learned a deep
respect for one of Goethe's couplets:
Whatever you can do, or dream you can do, begin it.
Boldness has genius, power, and magic in it!”
http://german.about.com/library/blgermyth12.htm |
Road
trip!
www.kimbellart.org/index.aspx
See Michelangelo’s
earliest painting! at the Kimbell Art Museum in Ft. Worth, TX

Announced Wednesday, May 13, 2009: Michelangelo’s
earliest painting, "The Torment of Saint Anthony," measuring 18˝ by 13Ľ inches, has
been acquired by the Kimbell Art Museum. Executed in oil and tempera on
a wooden panel, this work is the first painting by Michelangelo
Buonarroti (1475–1564) to enter an American collection, and one of
only four known easel paintings generally believed to come from his
hand. Holdings include works ranging in period from
antiquity to the 20th century; including masterpieces by Fra Angelico,
Caravaggio, El Greco, Cézanne, Matisse, and Picasso, as well as
antiquities, Asian, African, and pre-Columbian art.
The
Clark: The Sterling and Francine Clark Art
Institute, 225 South Street, Williamstown, MA 01267 413-458-2303...The
core of the paintings collection is a large suite of Impressionist works
with more than 35 works of Pierre-Auguste Renoir who remained for them,
the quintessential Impressionist.
Tacoma, WA: The
Museum of Glass is hot! http://www.museumofglass.org/
Dale Chihuly
slideshow: http://museumofglass.org/images/programs...
Tacoma Art Museum:
[architect: Antoine
Predock] see works by significant Northwest artists: Mark
Tobey, Morris Graves, Guy Anderson, Jacob Lawrence, Marie Watt, and
Gaylen Hansen, among others. http://www.tacomaartmuseum.org/
Boston Fine Art
Museum, http://www.mfa.org/
The Art
Institute of Chicago - see one of my favorites: Frans Snyders, Still Life with Dead Game, Fruits, and Vegetables in a
Market, 1614 http://www.artic.edu/artaccess/...
Museum
der Bildenden Künste, Leipzigo - see one of
my favorites: "Vir Dolorum" (Man of Sorrows) by Master Francke, c. 1420 Tempera
on oak, 42,5 x 31,5 cm (with the original frame)
|
|

NorthernFront
Studio & Design Terry R. Reid, founder, editor, creative design,
marketing & promotions 307-399-2777
Gamut's |


gallery attendant the name of the artist, they
will stamp your map. Turn in ... Leonard, Sara J. Schleicher
& Michael Tarr.. The Black Swamp Wood County Mural. 30 ...www.downtownbgohio.org/
art_walk_2009_
gallery_map.pdf
[PDF] summer 2008
Sarah Gadd, assistant curator of the Art Museum, assists artist Steven
Siegel ... Ms. Sara J. Schleicher. Mr. Steven L.
Schrepferman. Mr. and Mrs. Homer A. Scott, Jr. www.uwyo.edu/artmuseumimages/
educationimages/UWAMEnewsletter.pdf
PDF] Summer 2009 NewsletterAwareness of this simultaneous duality is the artist's ...
Ms. Sara J. Schleicher. Mr. and Mrs. Dan Schwartz. Mr. and
Mrs. Homer A. Scott, Jr
Gamut's
| |
|